| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
   |
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi,
I am wondering what the 0.0 renter status and the isk injection means for the eve economy. Does someone know this? |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mag's wrote:ISK injection? You mean bounties?
yes and easy obtainable plex loot |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:How is it injecting isk? Outside of normal ratting/anomaly income that would have come from non-renters anyways.
the focus lies on the easyness off obtaining it with the current 0.0 geographics & the botlord agreements |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Trin Javidan wrote:Mag's wrote:ISK injection? You mean bounties? yes and easy obtainable plex loot Well if renters didn't do it, then the alliance holder pilots would. So I'm not sure I understand the problem.
If all the supermarkets would hand out cookies for free and other food still cost $$$, what effect would it have on the eating paterns of the supermarket customers? |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Trin Javidan wrote:botlord agreements Ahh, so you actually wish to talk about bots and their role in this?
no, no botting talks; just curious after the effects of the other stuff thats going on. Another timeframe for this interesting event was just before CCP changed the anomaly spawn sec status spawns somewhere in 2012? |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Still waiting for you to tell us of these serious concerns tbh. I care not for supermarket taste testers or loss leaders.
I know you dont care, you are just a troll   |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
21
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Trin Javidan wrote:Mag's wrote:Still waiting for you to tell us of these serious concerns tbh. I care not for supermarket taste testers or loss leaders. I know you dont care, you are just trolling Ahh so you not telling us the actual serious concerns you allude too, makes me a troll? So I ask, what serious concerns do you mean?
i dont know, you tell me... me thinks i should place my forgotten ? behind it i guess  |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
22
|
Posted - 2014.05.27 21:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Brooks Puuntai wrote:Most likely because the flood of FW alts are offsetting the 0.0 renters. That is IF the renter situation was that bad, which I wouldn't know.
Isnt FW more dangerous? Srry i am a noob, i would think that in FW you can be shot by a whole coalition everywere and in renter system you simply hide when some red is in local? an or use mobile bubbles? |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
23
|
Posted - 2014.05.28 14:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote: Because there are more people out there due to the ability to rent than there would be if renting was not possible. Right now there are renters AND alliance members. If renting were impossible, there would just be alliance members. Result: More people slurping up the big bounties.
But I see no way to make renting impossible, so we have what we have.
John Ending wrote: It means a lot of Titans.
Tippia wrote: That assumes that they wouldn't make the same kind of ISK elsewhere and that the alliances wouldn't compensate for their income loss by generating more ISK themselves.
SurrenderMonkey wrote: What an odd thing to say - as if renting only exists because there isn't a technical way to render it impossible, and if only there were such a mechanism, it would be done away with as something undesirable.
Nevyn Auscent wrote: Quick actual figures. Based on CCP's figures for 2012-2013 Null sec ratting/anoms injected somewhere in the region of 25-30 Trillion isk a month which is about 50% of isk injected into the economy.
Thanks for all the replies! I think i begin to understand it.
Could i draw the following conclusings from the quote's above?
-In the past is was mainly only Alliance members that used up space, now it is Alliance members AND renters. And looking at dotlan (http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliances) the renter alliances combined exist out of 22,000 characters, which is equal or slighly more than all the sov owner alliances combined. Where some renter alliances are 4*size of sov owner Alliance.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/Verite/influence.png
If renter & sov corp are the same size or more, why are renters not just take it or how are sov holders manage to capture / maintain the space? Is it because of titans? like what John Ending sais? (I am sorry i am a noob)
And where is isk actualy spend on, by those 2 groups? What effects will that have? Could i draw the conclusion that eve is just scaling up and that titans are a common thing now? Would it be something to have that can doomsday a titan? |
Trin Javidan
Caymen Labs
23
|
Posted - 2014.06.04 13:34:00 -
[10] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Oh wait I get it!
Renters = Immigrants
Stealth xenophobia thread
Gotcha
No, stealth "wtf all this renting is making mah plex too high topic", but most pancakes dont even get it. Fair enough. |
| |
|